ASK a medical patient how he feels about the internet and he may well wax lyrical. The web offers copious information about symptoms, diagnoses and treatments - empowering the individual to understand and discuss their illness.
Ask a physician, however, and you may well be met with a resigned roll of the eyes. Even if a patient has tapped into a reliable source of information, their understanding of how it applies to them may be way off-base.
One can easily imagine this divide widening thanks to the "self-tracking" movement, which stands to revolutionise doctor-patient relationships (see "Quantify thyself: Tracking your life from food to mood"). Monitoring your own vital signs promises significant benefits: continual health checks, advance warning of illness and personalised medicine.
But here's the rub. How should a doctor react to someone with no symptoms anxiously brandishing their own analysis of data from a consumer gadget? Equally, will patients eventually be compelled to understand or even conduct such analyses to secure proper treatment? Taking our health into our own hands is about to get a lot more complicated.
If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.
Have your say
Only subscribers may leave comments on this article. Please log in.
Only personal subscribers may leave comments on this article
Subscribe now to comment.
All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.
If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.
house of wax patrick willis team america snow day snow day neti pot iron chef
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.